Monday, February 3, 2014

Human Adaption to the Environment---Solar radiation


1. Solar radiation can negatively impact the survival of humans by disturbing homeostasis especially if solar radiation is high. Let’s look more closely at the Sun; it emits short-wave ultraviolet radiation (UVR) that is potentially harmful to life.  It therefore can be said UVR is a force of evolution whereas humans had to adapt to the environmental stress of UV radiation or perish.  For example, as overexposure to solar or UVR it causes skin cells to mutate creating cancer cells and therefore cancer.  Aside from cancer, if high levels of UV radiation are exposed to a person’s skin it causes a breakdown of B vitamin, a folate. Women, men, and children are all sensitive to folate levels and as such it can cause all different side effects. For women who are pregnant they are prescribed vitamins with enough folic acid to decrease the risk of miscarriages and prevent defect in babies such as neural tube defects. Earlier in their stages of pregnancy, folate is an essential vitamin for the process of DNA replication.  For men, a lack of folate can result in a reduction in the production of sperm cells. Lastly, increased sunlight exposure increases the chance for children to develop multiple sclerosis. Looking at skin color, light-colored skin favors production of vitamin D in northern latitudes, whereas darker colored skin can prevent people from producing enough vitamin D (necessary for Ca absorption)resulting in rickets disease in kids and osteoporosis in adults.
*Darker skin more prone to frostbite than lighter skin
2.
 A. Short Term
Unfortunately, there isn't a short term adaptation to solar radiation making it a dangerous stress especially for individuals with low levels of melanin. 

B. facultative adaptation
An example of a facultative adaptation is tanning. The physiological response to this environmental stress is influenced to an extent by duration and severity of the exposure. The simplest form of accommodation is tanning; it is a quick and temporary response due to external environmental changes.  As an example, increased exposure results in tanning and a decrease in exposure over time the skin will revert to its original color. Simply put, by increasing the number of melanin granules and the percent of different variations of melanin is responsible for a tan.

C. developmental adaptation
Melanin can have protective qualities against the harmful effects of solar radiation which is a developmental adaption.  So what determines skin color is the next question, the answer would be the number and size of melanin particles.  For instance, an individual with a higher ratio of pheomelanin their skin will tend to be more red to yellow color based.  

Individuals who have a higher percentage of eumelanin their overall hue will be more dark brown to black tint.

Studying human variation in this manner is beneficial because it expresses environmental stresses and teaches us how various populations adapt to them. This information can be used to understand why fair skinned races are more susceptible to skin cancer then dark skinned races. It also helped in the development of sunscreen lotion which is an artificial version of melanin.  Races that express the trait for dark complexion are genetically favored by natural selection when it comes to solar radiation.
D. Cultural adaptation
Solar radiation is so damaging that our body can’t react fast enough other than physically seeking shelter when the sun is out when there is nowhere to go for shade.  Adaptations such as wearing hats etc. are more behavioral than any other type of adaption.  Examples of cultural adaptations are sunglasses, hats, clothes and sunscreen.  Before people spend a day in the sun, they will usually apply sunscreen to prevent or reduce risk of skin damage and tanning.  People also wear sunglasses, hats and extra clothing (beach cover-up) to protect them from solar radiation.

3. The study of the gradual change of a species' traits across different populations is beneficial because it shows why certain people have health problems, or are healthier than others or have the skin tone they do, or why it is beneficial to have the skin tone that they do. By looking at the clines of solar radiation (where melanin is protective against UV) versus the need for vitamin D absorption (where melanin is not protective against UV) shows that in areas where UV protection is needed, skin color is darker, and where people need more vitamin D over UV protection, their skin is lighter. By using UV radiation as a factor in studies high frequencies of rickets disease, or the need for vitamin D in healthy pregnancies, it can be helpful to know who needs more vitamin D, or need to be in the sun less or more to be healthier.

 4.  The study of environmental influences on adaptations is a better way to understand human variation than by the use of race because race is a cultural and social characteristic.  The adaptations of solar radiation are better understood by studying the 4 facets of adaptation (short term, facultative, developmental and cultural).  As seen in the developmental adaptation melanin, skin color is the result of this adaptation. Different environmental clines and melanin makeup in individuals are what cause skin color. It is one of the many adaptations to deal with high levels of solar radiation. These adaptations are key to these major variations and changes in the appearance and makeup of humans. Environmental influences are what must be studied in order to learn about why there is variation among humans, especially skin color.  The variation of skin color shows that our bodies are influenced by many simple things that normally people would not think of like the sun or altitude. Race on the other hand is all cultural based and has little to nothing to do with skin color at all therefore it is easier to understand variation by looking how a population adapts to exposure of the sun by the pigmentation of the skin.

Monday, January 27, 2014

The Piltdown Hoax



       In the 1900’s a hoax was created in the village of Piltdown in London, it was called the Piltdown Hoax.  An amateur archaeologist Charles Dawson began digging in Piltdown and in 1908 he unearthed a skull in a gravel pit.  In 1911 he discovers more fossil fragments consisting of teeth, soon after there was a public announcement stating the fossils were possibly that of a human skull.  Dawson sought the help of a geologist from England named Arthur Smith Woodward and a leading anatomist Arthur Keith to foster his research.  Ultimately, Woodward confirmed Dawson’s discovery was that of a human skull and described the jaw as apelike in shape.  Woodward was a leading geologist during this time and due to his reputation the scientific community deemed the discovery as the remains of an early human as valid.  Eventually, the scientific community believed this discovery provided the missing link between humans and apes shedding great notoriety for England.  This is important because during this time there was extreme pressure to produce an English fossil because every other Super Power countries had already discovered fossilized early human bones. 
       Later in 1953 Dawson’s discovery in Piltdown was revealed to be a fake, as the skull was modern in shape and the fossils appeared to be altered.  As a result of the advances in technology, the Piltown fossils were tested for its fluorine content, sparking the beginning of the controversy.  The fluorine test of 1949 revealed the fossils were younger than initially claimed.  Better dating methods made it apparent that the stain on the skull was superficial and a steel knife was used to cut the bone.  Furthermore, scientists utilized new technology such as the microscope, to look at the teeth and they discovered the teeth had been filed down, the teeth had fillings, and had deep scratch marks. The data from the new technology revealed that the jaw bone belonged to an orangutan.  All this evidence pointed to one conclusion, that the Piltdown Man was a fake fossil and a hoax.   
       What partially inspired Dawson’s rash enthusiasm for his discovery was his pride, however there were social and political factors supporting the hoax.  Such pride and external factors help to explain the human factor which was involved in the Piltdown hoax.  It is possible to remove the human factor in scientific research by questioning, verifying the facts, and utilizing credible tools before deciding if data is reliable as these are positive aspects of the scientific process; doing this will help to decrease the amount of errors in the data and outcomes of the research.  I would want to remove the human factor from science as scientific research is an advanced and complex skill.  It requires critical thinking as well as an understanding of the complexity of research design and analysis.  If human factors interfere with the primary study it will decrease both the internal validity and external validity of the research.  The Piltdown Man demonstrates the failures of scientific knowledge as a result of wishful thinking, professional courtesy, and bias.  It is imperative that the new dating technology (of that time) was utilized to measure the data which included microscopes and a series of fluorine testing completed by Kenneth Oakley which revealed the accuracy of the data.    
        The life lesson learned from the Piltdown hoax is that research is judged by trustworthiness and credibility of the results.  Threats to the validity of the research can be minimized by creating a logical argument, proper data collection, use of proper tools of measurement, and controlling bias.  Therefore, it’s imperative a valid research study is one in which there is sufficient evidence to support the claim excluding the human factor.

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Analogous VS. Homologous


 Homologous
Homologous animals are include species which are related to each other and they share a trait due to common ancestry.  For clarification, these homologous structures don’t necessarily have the same function.  Let’s study some evidence and evaluate two species, the giraffe and human indicating these two species may have arisen by a common descent.  Primarily, the embryonic structures of both species reflect the same skeletal structure of both the giraffe and human.  Both structures look strikingly different on the outside however they vary in purpose. 
The cervical spine of a giraffe is made of seven bones just as the neck of a human.  In contrast the giraffe neck is slinky; the cervical vertebrae are bound together with ball-and-socket joints, allowing the giraffe to extend its head virtually perpendicular to the ground. Humans’ thoracic vertebrae are joined at the middle providing stability and our cervical vertebrae are also fused at the front and back for more mobility with less flexibility.   The result of the giraffes ball-and-socket joints  we see the neck move back and forth when it walks because of their weight and motion of the neck to balance the giraffe's center of gravity.  In addition, their neck flips back and forth assist them in when standing.  In contrast, we swing our arms up over a chair or table to support us out from a sitting position.  Lastly, the spotting on the giraffes coat and or skin provides camouflage as the purpose of spots on human skins is not quite clear yet.

The giraffe and human have a common general ancestors which are vertebrates and we know that ancestors possessed this trait are derived at the early stages of development.  The skeletal evidence and biochemistry reveal the similarities between the organisms such as the DNA, hormones, bones and tissues, and the respiratory breathing pattern to rid of waste products, such as carbon dioxide.
                    



                            vs        





Analogous
Anologous traits are similar due to reasons other than relatedness and are governed by structural genes  and regulatory genes.  The similarities among anologous species can result from random chance or as a result of the organisms ability to adapt to their environments. 
As described by Berkeley University (2014) dolphins and sharks both share similarities as they both a streamlined body, a triangular fin on their back, and two side fins.
Sharks                                                                                                                       Dolphins
skeleton made of cartilage                                                                                   skeleton made of bone 
use gills to get oxygen from the water                                 go to the surface and breathe atmospheric   air in through their blowholes
                                                                
don't nurse their young                                                                             do nurse their young
don't have hair                                                                                  born with hair around their "noses"

The Pakicetus which is the earliest Cetacean is the ancestor to both species the dolphin and the shark.  This ancestor possesses the same analogous trait as the dolphin and shark’s based on skeletons found in the Punjab region of Pakistan.  With the fossils researchers excavated they were able to analyze skeletal structures and they surmise the forelimbs of the Pakicetus were later formed into flippers. 



Understanding Evolution. (2014). http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/home.php

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

   

Historical Influences on Darwin

  

   

The brilliant observer of nature Charles Darwin born Feburuary 12, 1809 looked diligently at the diversity of life on Earth, from barnacles to butterflies and made him curious (American Museum of Natural History, n.d.).  Through his study of life and geological observations Darwin recognized differences among species as both human and non-human.  This contributed to the theory of evolution and natural selection permanently marking a place for him in history.  

Darwin's modern thinking allowed him to create ideas and theories unprecedented in science during his time.  A collection of his thoughts were put together in a book called The Origins of Species and went into print November 22, 1959.  Following this he wrote The Decent of Man in 1871, both the publications created a new spark in evolutionary thought and natural selection contributing to the scientific revolution.  Darwin contributed greatly to scientific history as he believed natural selection was a process of a persons characteristics permitted them to survive (Jurmain, Kilgore, Trevathan, & Ciochon, 2014, p. 46).

 References:

American Museum of Natural History. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/past-exhibitions/darwin

Jurmain, R., Kilgore, L., Trevathan, W., & Ciochon, R. L. (2014). The development of evolutionary theory. In Introduction to physical anthropology (14th ed.). Belmont, Ca: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.